We're getting so close to having our little boy here with us, I'm so excited.
I'm also nervous, but not about what I guess most new moms are. I'm more nervous about our doctor appointment tomorrow, complete with ultrasound.
Tomorrow we talk about our options with our doctor and I have been anxious about the fact he's measuring large, not because I'm scared of birthing a large baby but because I think my doctor will err on the side of "caution".
Since it was first mentioned we may have to do a c-section due to his size I've done lots of research, I've posted about it here frequently... I feel like I need to shut up about it, but until I know for sure I'll at least be able to get a trial of labor I'm just so anxious.
I've done my research, everything I've seen keeps me coming back to not doing a c-section just because it's thought he may be large. Late in pregnancy ultrasounds aren't always accurate and can be off by a pound or more. I am aware this means he could be bigger than 9.6lbs, but that doesn't worry me much either. I wanted a hospital birth to begin with so that we would have that safety net, of course if I knew what I know now I might have tried to figure out a way to go to a birthing center out of state, but I did like the comfort of knowing if something were to go wrong, I'd be right where I needed to be to fix it. I'm just not convinced a c-section is medically necessary when I have had a completely normal, healthy pregnancy and have no risk factors that would lead me to a c-section (breech, cord prolapse, gestational diabetes, etc). If tomorrow the ultrasound were to show there's an actual problem that normally warrants an ultrasound I wouldn't hesitate to have one... but women give birth to large babies all the time. I know women give birth to breech babies too, but in that scenario I would likely err on the side of caution (he was in position at 35 weeks, though... so I'm expecting him to still be there). So I don't feel I'm being unreasonable.
I think some people think I'm more concerned with my body, and I am... I don't want major surgery for no reason after all. But who would? But it's also for my baby that I'm concerned with not only his health but my own. A c-section raises my risk of death during birth by 3-4%, if I understand correctly. I can get infection, I won't be able to care for him like I would were I to have a vaginal birth. I'll have to be recovering. I don't think I'm being selfish, if I were so concerned with my body and what's easiest I might just opt for the c-section. I just trust my body.
I mentioned to my aunt I wasn't planning to get an epidural and that he may be large and I was hoping for a vaginal birth and she started to try to talk up c-sections. She said some stuff I knew for a fact was untrue just from all the research I've done, but I just agreed politely since in the end it's my choice. Rather, she tried to give me what is likely "common knowledge" but is in fact false. That the doctor has likely seen a lot of births--true, but how many natural births? Likely not many. Ob/gyns are surgeons and they like to do what they're most familiar with, so they are (in general) quick to push for surgery from what I've come to understand. That the doctor has no interest other than for me to have a healthy baby-- I have no doubt my doctor wants this, but she also wants to avoid a possible lawsuit. She doesn't necessarily have what's healthiest for me in mind, and even the baby... she can avoid some risks, but she's also avoiding positive aspects of natural birth in the process. We'll come out alive and I'll be able to recover and he'll be fine, I have no doubt... but that doesn't mean it's the best or healthiest way. My aunt also said that sometimes it's kinder to the baby to not put them through birth, but natural birth is what is supposed to happen. It has health benefits for the child, first of all... and the child takes part in initiating it in natural, non-induced labors. I can't imagine being happy in my nice, warm womb and then suddenly ripping me out of it, regardless of if I'm fully developed and ready to go or not. That's much worse, in my opinion. I was a c-section baby, as was Patrick. We're fine, I know if I have to get one he'll be fine... but that doesn't make it the best choice until there is a medical reason for it.
To top it off, my aunt never had children of her own, though I know she wanted to. I don't know that she's ever read a pregnancy book and even if she had, we know more now than we did 20-30 years ago. My mom was amazed by all the knowledge I had and said how she had read a pregnancy book but didn't know anything like I do.
I read a book on c-sections, I think it was trying to normalize them and make it seem ok to have one... And on the one hand I understood their purpose, women who get c-sections when they don't want them sometimes feel like they're failures... But at the same time, it's not ideal and I felt like they tried to ignore that fact and sweep it under the rug. Yes, if you need to get a c-section that's fine and you should feel no shame. I told Patrick how I felt like as long as I was allowed a trial of labor, I don't think if I had to get a c-section that I'd regret it so much. If I have to get a planned c-section I'll always wonder "Could I have done it?" and feel like my doctor didn't have faith in me or my body, faith I do have in myself... but if I went in, tried for vaginal and was unable to deliver without a c-section? I may be mildly disappointed, but I'd recognize sometimes these things happen and that was the way my birth needed to be.
I could go on and on but poor Patrick just got home and I'm sitting here ignoring him, I should spend time with my husband.
Anyway, I'm so anxious for him to get here. Since I'm full term by both estimated due-dates now part of me would love for him to come this week in the hopes I can have my birth my way... but at the same time, I'd rather him stay in there 'til he's good and ready to come out. If she does want to plan a c-section I'll likely push for her to go to 40 or 41 weeks, since my due date was moved up a week I figure at 40 weeks he'll be 39 weeks at least and I want him to get to that point... but at 41 weeks if he hasn't come yet he'd be 40 weeks by my original (which since I'm pretty much 99% sure of when we did the deed, I'm convinced my original due date is the correct one) and I can't imagine pushing my luck any longer than that. But we'll find out tomorrow! Then I guess I can stop thinking about it so much (or start thinking about it more and more, augh).
It's raining and gross out so we may get my 38 week pic today or wait 'til it clears up... I don't know. We'll see!